Made a few incremental updates to the Gist over the past few hours. Happy to see that a few SD forks/UIs are implementing something like this – they're better situated than me to make something that's useable by non-coders. :)
It seems that the results are quite often best when cond_scale is set to 0.0 – exactly why this is, I don't know. If anyone has an idea, I would love an explanation. With cond_scale at zero, the given prompt has no effect.
In the meantime, I've got to see my share of extremely creepy pictures while experimenting with other cond_scales. Run this on a portrait with cond_scale set to 5.0 and use the resulting noise to generate a picture (also with scale > 2.0) ... or don't. I wouldn't advise doing so personally, especially if you have a superstitious bent. (Or maybe you're going to get completely different results than I got, who knows?)
I am using the automatic1111 implementation of your code. It is really difficult to have an effect of a prompt on generating a new image (hair color change or adding a helmet for example). Often it changes the whole face etc
11
u/Aqwis Sep 12 '22 edited Sep 12 '22
Made a few incremental updates to the Gist over the past few hours. Happy to see that a few SD forks/UIs are implementing something like this – they're better situated than me to make something that's useable by non-coders. :)
It seems that the results are quite often best when
cond_scale
is set to 0.0 – exactly why this is, I don't know. If anyone has an idea, I would love an explanation. With cond_scale at zero, the given prompt has no effect.In the meantime, I've got to see my share of extremely creepy pictures while experimenting with other cond_scales. Run this on a portrait with cond_scale set to 5.0 and use the resulting noise to generate a picture (also with scale > 2.0) ... or don't. I wouldn't advise doing so personally, especially if you have a superstitious bent. (Or maybe you're going to get completely different results than I got, who knows?)